More on New York

The rest of what we have written about New York. Every figure is quoted from New York’s own statute or its courts’ own published schedule, and carries the date we last checked it.

Guardians ad litem and child representation in New York: who they are, what they owe your child, and who pays

If custody is contested in New York, the court can appoint someone to look into your family and report to the judge. This page is what New York’s own statutes and court rules say about who that person is, what duty they owe, and — the part almost nobody asks in time — who pays for them.

How this page is sourced

Everything below is traced to New York’s own statute or court rule, quoted where the wording matters. Where we could not verify something from a primary source, the page says so in plain terms rather than filling the space. This is information, not legal advice. Corrections go up at thecusp.app/corrections.

Duty owed
The child’s wishes
A client-directed role: advocates for what the child actually says they want.
Who can serve
Must be an attorney
Who pays
The parties, by court order
Allocated between you at the court’s discretion.
Official rate
$158 per hour statewide assigned-counsel rate under County L

What the role is called here

attorney for the child

Names matter more than they look. A guardian ad litem generally argues for what they judge is best for your child and is not your child’s lawyer. An attorney for the child argues for what your child actually wants. Those are opposite duties. The four roles, explained in full.

How an appointment happens

N.Y. Family Court Act § 249(a)
In any other proceeding in which the court has jurisdiction, the court may appoint an attorney to represent the child, when, in the opinion of the family court judge, such representation will serve the purposes of this act, if independent legal counsel is not available to the child

Source: N.Y. Family Court Act § 249(a) · source

What duty they owe your child

client-directed (wishes), with a narrow substituted-judgment exception – governed by 22 NYCRR § 7.2, ‘Function of the Attorney for the Child’

In the statute’s own words
the attorney for the child must zealously advocate the child’s position… where the child is capable of knowing, voluntary and considered judgment, the attorney for the child should be directed by the wishes of the child, even if the attorney for the child believes that what the child wants is not in the child’s best interests

Source: N.Y. Family Court Act § 249(a) · source

Who can be appointed

The role is defined by statute and rule as an ‘attorney for the child’ appointed under Family Court Act § 249, i.e., a licensed attorney, not a lay guardian ad litem.

Who pays

N.Y. Judiciary Law § 35(8)
supreme court shall also appoint counsel and such counsel shall be compensated in accordance with the provisions of this section

Source: N.Y. Judiciary Law § 35(8) · source

If you cannot pay

Attorneys for the child appointed under Family Court Act § 249 / Judiciary Law § 35(8) are compensated by the state (through the Appellate Division’s Attorney for the Child program), not billed directly to the parties, when independent counsel is not otherwise available to the child.

Published rate

$158 per hour statewide assigned-counsel rate under County Law Article 18-B, effective April 1, 2023 (New York State Office of Indigent Legal Services)

Custody evaluations

New York governs court-ordered custody evaluations and investigations separately from the appointment of a guardian ad litem. An evaluator is a witness, not an advocate — and their recommendation is a recommendation, not a ruling a judge is bound by.

Source: N.Y. Family Court Act § 251 · source

Before an evaluation begins, it is worth asking which psychological instruments will be used. The peer-reviewed literature is openly critical of several still in circulation — one has interrater reliability reported as ranging from 50% to 100%. The evidence, in full.

The thing worth knowing about New York

New York uniquely titles the role ‘attorney for the child’ (formerly ‘law guardian’) and, under 22 NYCRR § 7.2, makes it an ordinary client-directed attorney-client relationship rather than a best-interests advocate: the attorney must follow the child’s expressed wishes even if the attorney disagrees, departing only where the child lacks capacity or following the child’s wishes would place the child at substantial risk of imminent, serious harm.

Other states

Related

Sources last checked29 August 2026
Page published29 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.