More on Wisconsin

The rest of what we have written about Wisconsin. Every figure is quoted from Wisconsin’s own statute or its courts’ own published schedule, and carries the date we last checked it.

Guardians ad litem and child representation in Wisconsin: who they are, what they owe your child, and who pays

If custody is contested in Wisconsin, the court can appoint someone to look into your family and report to the judge. This page is what Wisconsin’s own statutes and court rules say about who that person is, what duty they owe, and — the part almost nobody asks in time — who pays for them.

How this page is sourced

Everything below is traced to Wisconsin’s own statute or court rule, quoted where the wording matters. Where we could not verify something from a primary source, the page says so in plain terms rather than filling the space. This is information, not legal advice. Corrections go up at thecusp.app/corrections.

Duty owed
Hybrid
The duty depends on which role is appointed, or the statute blends the two.
Who can serve
Must be an attorney
Who pays
The parties, by court order
Allocated between you at the court’s discretion.
Official rate
No published rate
No official fee schedule exists that we could find.
The short version7 points · tap one to jump to it
  1. What the role is called here — A guardian ad litem generally argues for what they judge is best for your child and is not your child’s lawyer.
  2. How an appointment happens
  3. What duty they owe your child
  4. Who can be appointed
  5. Who pays — We looked for an official Wisconsin fee schedule for privately appointed guardians ad litem and custody evaluators, and did not find one.
  6. Custody evaluations — Wisconsin governs court-ordered custody evaluations and investigations separately from the appointment of a guardian ad litem.
  7. The thing worth knowing about Wisconsin
In this subject 9

What the role is called here

guardian ad litem

Names matter more than they look. A guardian ad litem generally argues for what they judge is best for your child and is not your child’s lawyer. An attorney for the child argues for what your child actually wants. Those are opposite duties. The four roles, explained in full.

How an appointment happens

Wis. Stat. § 767.407(1)(a)
The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for a minor child in any action affecting the family if any of the following conditions exists: 1. The court has reason for special concern as to the welfare of a minor child. 2. …the legal custody or physical placement of the child is contested.

Source: Wis. Stat. § 767.407(1)(a) · source

What duty they owe your child

hybrid

In the statute’s own words
The guardian ad litem shall be an advocate for the best interests of a minor child as to paternity, legal custody, physical placement, and support… shall consider, but shall not be bound by, the wishes of the minor child… Unless the child otherwise requests, the guardian ad litem shall communicate to the court the wishes of the child as to the child’s legal custody or physical placement.

Source: Wis. Stat. § 767.407(1)(a) · source

Who can be appointed

Wis. Stat. § 767.407(3): ‘The guardian ad litem shall be an attorney admitted to practice in this state.’

Who pays

Wis. Stat. § 767.407(6)
The guardian ad litem shall be compensated at a rate that the court determines is reasonable. The court shall order either or both parties to pay all or any part of the compensation of the guardian ad litem.

Source: Wis. Stat. § 767.407(6) · source

If you cannot pay

Wis. Stat. § 767.407(6): ‘If both parties are indigent, the court may direct that the county of venue pay the compensation and fees.’ Wisconsin case law further holds that if only ONE party is indigent, the court may not shift the fee to the county or the indigent party — its only option is to order the non-indigent party to pay the full fee (Olmsted v. Circuit Court, 2000 WI App 261).

There is no published price

We looked for an official Wisconsin fee schedule for privately appointed guardians ad litem and custody evaluators, and did not find one. That is true of most states — only a handful publish figures at all, among them Arkansas, Massachusetts and Minnesota, and those are subsidized program rates rather than market ones.

The numbers circulating online come from law-firm marketing pages. We will not repeat those as though they were sourced. Call your county family court clerk and ask what appointees there actually charge. It is local, current, and free.

Custody evaluations

Wisconsin governs court-ordered custody evaluations and investigations separately from the appointment of a guardian ad litem. An evaluator is a witness, not an advocate — and their recommendation is a recommendation, not a ruling a judge is bound by.

Source: Wis. Stat. § 767.405(14) (legal custody or physical placement study) · source

Before an evaluation begins, it is worth asking which psychological instruments will be used. The peer-reviewed literature is openly critical of several still in circulation — one has interrater reliability reported as ranging from 50% to 100%. The evidence, in full.

The thing worth knowing about Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s GAL appointment is mandatory, not discretionary, whenever legal custody or physical placement is contested (§ 767.407(1)(a)2.), unless a narrow modification-case exception applies (§ 767.407(1)(am)). Its fee-allocation rule also produces a counterintuitive result confirmed by the Court of Appeals in Olmsted v. Circuit Court (2000 WI App 261): if only one parent is indigent, the county cannot be ordered to pay and the indigent parent cannot be ordered to pay — the entire GAL fee falls on the single non-indigent parent by default.

Other states

Related

Sources last checked29 August 2026
Page published29 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.