Guardians ad litem and child representation in Pennsylvania: who they are, what they owe your child, and who pays

If custody is contested in Pennsylvania, the court can appoint someone to look into your family and report to the judge. This page is what Pennsylvania’s own statutes and court rules say about who that person is, what duty they owe, and — the part almost nobody asks in time — who pays for them.

How this page is sourced

Everything below is traced to Pennsylvania’s own statute or court rule, quoted where the wording matters. Where we could not verify something from a primary source, the page says so in plain terms rather than filling the space. This is information, not legal advice. Corrections go up at thecusp.app/corrections.

Duty owed
Hybrid
The duty depends on which role is appointed, or the statute blends the two.
Who can serve
Depends on the role
This state has more than one appointee role with different requirements.
Who pays
The parties, by court order
Allocated between you at the court’s discretion.
Official rate
No published rate
No official fee schedule exists that we could find.

What the role is called here

guardian ad litemcounsel for the child

Names matter more than they look. A guardian ad litem generally argues for what they judge is best for your child and is not your child’s lawyer. An attorney for the child argues for what your child actually wants. Those are opposite duties. The four roles, explained in full.

How an appointment happens

23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5334(a); 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5335(a)
The court may on its own motion or the motion of a party appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the child in the action… The court may appoint counsel to represent the child if the court determines that the appointment will assist in resolving the issues in the custody proceeding.

Source: 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5334(a); 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5335(a) · source

What duty they owe your child

hybrid/dual role, split by appointee: guardian ad litem follows best interests; counsel for the child follows the child’s legal/expressed interests. If both are appointed, they are formally split.

In the statute’s own words
If a child has legal counsel and a guardian ad litem, counsel shall represent the legal interests of the child and the guardian ad litem shall represent the best interests of the child.

Source: 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5334(a); 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5335(a) · source

Who can be appointed

23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5334(a) states ‘the guardian ad litem must be an attorney at law,’ but Pa.R.Civ.P. 1915.25(b) currently SUSPENDS that requirement, along with the GAL’s dual best-interests/legal-interests role and rights to examine/cross-examine witnesses – meaning a non-attorney may currently serve as guardian ad litem. Separately, ‘counsel for the child’ under § 5335 is by definition an attorney.

Who pays

23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5334(e); 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5335(d)
The court may order a party to pay all or part of the costs of appointing a guardian ad litem under this section.

Source: 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5334(e); 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5335(d) · source

No indigency waiver found

We searched and found no provision in Pennsylvania waiving or shifting these fees for a party who cannot pay them. That does not prove none exists — courts have general fee-waiver powers — but there is no dedicated protection we could point you to. Raise it early if it applies to you.

There is no published price

We looked for an official Pennsylvania fee schedule for privately appointed guardians ad litem and custody evaluators, and did not find one. That is true of almost every state — only Minnesota and Massachusetts publish figures, and both are subsidised program rates rather than market ones.

The numbers circulating online come from law-firm marketing pages. We will not repeat those as though they were sourced. Call your county family court clerk and ask what appointees there actually charge. It is local, current, and free.

The thing worth knowing about Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania’s own statute requires a guardian ad litem to be a licensed attorney (23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5334(a)), but that specific requirement – along with the GAL’s dual best-interests/legal-interests role, right to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and bar on testifying – has been suspended by Pa.R.Civ.P. 1915.25(b), so the statute as written no longer fully controls; courts and litigants must consult the rule, not just the statute, to know who may currently serve.

What we could not verify

For Pennsylvania we could not confirm the following from a primary source, and we would rather say so than guess:

  • the custody evaluation provision

If you practice in Pennsylvania and can point us at the right provision, tell us. Corrections are published with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.

Other states

Related

Sources last checked29 August 2026
Page published29 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.