More on Maryland

The rest of what we have written about Maryland. Every figure is quoted from Maryland’s own statute or its courts’ own published schedule, and carries the date we last checked it.

Guardians ad litem and child representation in Maryland: who they are, what they owe your child, and who pays

If custody is contested in Maryland, the court can appoint someone to look into your family and report to the judge. This page is what Maryland’s own statutes and court rules say about who that person is, what duty they owe, and — the part almost nobody asks in time — who pays for them.

How this page is sourced

Everything below is traced to Maryland’s own statute or court rule, quoted where the wording matters. Where we could not verify something from a primary source, the page says so in plain terms rather than filling the space. This is information, not legal advice. Corrections go up at thecusp.app/corrections.

Duty owed
Hybrid
The duty depends on which role is appointed, or the statute blends the two.
Who can serve
Must be an attorney
Who pays
The parties, by court order
Allocated between you at the court’s discretion.
Official rate
Harford County Circuit Court (part of the Maryland Judiciary

What the role is called here

child advocate attorneybest interest attorneychild’s privilege attorney

Names matter more than they look. A guardian ad litem generally argues for what they judge is best for your child and is not your child’s lawyer. An attorney for the child argues for what your child actually wants. Those are opposite duties. The four roles, explained in full.

How an appointment happens

Md. Code, Family Law § 1-202; Md. Rule 9-205.1
In an action in which custody, visitation rights, or the amount of support of a minor child is contested, the court may: (1)(i) appoint a lawyer who shall serve as a child advocate attorney to represent the minor child… or (ii) appoint a lawyer who shall serve as a best interest attorney to represent the minor child…

Source: Md. Code, Family Law § 1-202; Md. Rule 9-205.1 · source

What duty they owe your child

hybrid/dual role — Maryland names three distinct attorney roles with different duty standards

In the statute’s own words
unverified — FL § 1-202 itself does not state the duty standard by role; per the Harford County Circuit Court’s official description of Md. Rule 9-205.1: an ‘Advocate’ attorney ‘advocates the child’s desire to the court,’ a ‘Best Interest Attorney’ ‘considers the child’s desire, but also gathers information from other sources and makes a recommendation to the Court,’ and a ‘Privilege Attorney’ ‘decides if a child’s privileged communication with a therapist should be waived.’

Source: Md. Code, Family Law § 1-202; Md. Rule 9-205.1 · source

Who can be appointed

Md. Code, Family Law § 1-202(a)(1) authorizes the court to ‘appoint a lawyer’ to serve in each of these roles, and subsection (b) requires that ‘a lawyer appointed under this section shall exercise ordinary care and diligence’ — all three roles under Rule 9-205.1 are attorney positions.

Who pays

Md. Code, Family Law § 1-202(a)(2)
impose counsel fees against one or more parties to the action

Source: Md. Code, Family Law § 1-202(a)(2) · source

If you cannot pay

none found in Family Law § 1-202 or Md. Rule 9-205.1 as a statewide provision; the Harford County Circuit Court’s own page states ‘Limited scholarships are available with financial documentation attached to a completed Fee Waiver Request form sent to the Court for approval,’ but this appears to be local county practice rather than a statewide statutory or rule-based indigency provision, so it is not cited as a verified statewide rule.

Published rate

Harford County Circuit Court (part of the Maryland Judiciary) publishes an hourly rate range of $250/hour-$425/hour for attorneys for children appointed under Md. Rule 9-205.1 — this is a county-level published rate on an official Maryland Judiciary page, not a verified statewide rate or cap.

Custody evaluations

Maryland governs court-ordered custody evaluations and investigations separately from the appointment of a guardian ad litem. An evaluator is a witness, not an advocate — and their recommendation is a recommendation, not a ruling a judge is bound by.

Source: Md. Rule 9-205.3 · source

Before an evaluation begins, it is worth asking which psychological instruments will be used. The peer-reviewed literature is openly critical of several still in circulation — one has interrater reliability reported as ranging from 50% to 100%. The evidence, in full.

The thing worth knowing about Maryland

Maryland is one of the few states with a formally named third representation role beyond the usual best-interest/wishes split: the ‘Child’s Privilege Attorney,’ whose sole function is to decide whether the child’s privileged communications with a therapist should be waived and disclosed to the court, distinct from both the wishes-driven ‘Child Advocate Attorney’ (formerly called guardian ad litem/child’s attorney) and the independent-judgment ‘Best Interest Attorney.’

Other states

Related

Sources last checked29 August 2026
Page published29 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.