Protective orders in Mississippi.
Who can ask for one, what you have to show, what a judge can order, what it costs, and what happens if it is broken — quoted from Mississippi’s own statutes, not summarized.
See a different stateMississippi
Mississippi issues domestic abuse protection orders under the Protection from Domestic Abuse Law at article 1 of chapter 21 of title 93. What is unusual here is not the test but the plumbing: four different courts are involved, and which one you are standing in decides what kind of order you can get and how long it can last. That is dealt with first below, because going to the wrong building is the most common way to lose a day.
Which court you go to
Four courts, two different orders
Mississippi is organized differently from most states, and getting this right saves a wasted journey. Different courts issue different orders, and the one you can reach fastest is not the one that can give you the longer order.
Municipal and justice courts can issue a temporary domestic abuse protection order. These are the local courts, and they are the quick route.
Chancery and county courts issue the final domestic abuse protection order or approve a consent agreement. This is where the longer-term order comes from.
So the practical path in Mississippi is often: get the temporary order from the court you can reach today, then go to chancery or county court for the final one. Ask the clerk which court you are standing in and what it can issue.
How long each order lasts
Thirty days, one year, or as long as the court thinks right
There is an exception that works in your favor where it applies. Where the parties have no minor children in common, a temporary order may run beyond thirty days — up to one year.
That is a substantial difference. A person with no children in common with the respondent may be able to obtain a year of protection from a municipal or justice court, without ever reaching chancery court. If that describes you, it is worth raising expressly, because the default assumption in the room will be thirty days.
A final order runs for whatever period the court considers appropriate. There is no statutory ceiling in those words at all — which means, as in Arkansas and Wisconsin, that the length turns on what is asked for and what the court is told.
The second sentence is a protection for you: the expiration date must be clearly stated in the order. When you receive it, read that date and write it down.
The registry
Why this matters for enforcement
A copy also goes to the sheriff’s department in the county where the order was issued.
This matters at the moment you most need it to. An officer responding to a call can check the registry and see that the order exists, rather than depending on you producing a piece of paper in the middle of an emergency. It is still worth carrying a copy — but the registry is the reason a Mississippi order should be enforceable even when you cannot.
If you are ever told by an officer that no order shows up, the entry is made by the clerk of the court, and that is where to ask about it.
Does this cover me?
Who is covered, and what counts as abuse
Mississippi’s eligibility list is broad, and it includes current and former dating relationships without any cohabitation requirement.
Note the asymmetry: relatives by blood or marriage are covered only if you reside together or formerly resided together, but people in a dating relationship are covered whether or not you ever lived together.
It also covers criminal sexual conduct against minors, stalking, cyberstalking and sexual offenses by reference to the criminal code.
Two points worth drawing out. Recklessly causing injury counts, so it need not have been deliberate. And cyberstalking is named, which reaches conduct carried out entirely online.
The definition expressly does not include any act of self-defense.
If they break it
Misdemeanour or contempt — but not both
The court may instead hold the person in contempt — but, as in Kentucky, a person cannot face both a criminal conviction and contempt for the same violation. One route or the other.
The offense covers a knowing violation of a protection order, a court-approved consent agreement, or a bond condition. It also expressly covers orders from other states — "a similar order issued by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction for the purpose of protecting a person from domestic abuse" — and orders from state military courts.
One procedural detail with practical value: law enforcement must use a uniform offense report when investigating a violation, and the court must enter the disposition into that report on conviction. That is what makes a Mississippi violation traceable later, which matters if you are ever asking a court to take the history into account.
Firearms in Mississippi: there is no provision, in this chapter or anywhere
What we looked for
We went through the sections of Miss. Code ch. 93-21 — including § 93-21-13 (emergency orders), § 93-21-15 (temporary and final orders, which is where a firearms provision would sit) and § 93-21-21 (violations and penalties) — looking for firearms, weapons, ammunition, surrender and relinquishment. None of those terms appears.
The relief available under § 93-21-15 is: directing the respondent to refrain from abusing; prohibiting or limiting physical proximity; prohibiting or limiting contact “whether in person, by telephone or by other electronic communication”; granting you possession of the residence to the exclusion of the respondent; and prohibiting the transfer or disposal of mutually owned property. Firearms are not in that list.
Nor is there a separate Mississippi statute elsewhere in the Code. Two independent sources confirm it: the federal firearms authority’s own compilation of Mississippi state firearms laws contains nothing on protective orders, and the Giffords Law Center’s Mississippi page, updated in July 2026, states that Mississippi law does not prohibit possession by people subject to domestic violence protective orders, does not require courts to notify people when they become federally prohibited, and does not require surrender.
So in Mississippi the federal rule is the whole of the protection. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) makes possession a federal crime for someone subject to a qualifying order — one made after a hearing they had notice of and could attend. Mississippi adds nothing, notifies nobody, and collects nothing. That is a hard thing to read, and it is better to know it than to assume otherwise.
What follows from it practically: make sure your final order is made after a hearing rather than left at the emergency stage, ask the judge for an express finding that the respondent is a credible threat to your physical safety, and tell law enforcement what firearms exist and where they are kept. The federal charge is real, but somebody has to find the gun for it to matter.
▸ See how this compares — all 50 states, side by side
The part that is the same in every state
An order from one state works in all of them
This is federal law and it does not change at a state line. An order issued by one state, tribe or territory must be enforced by every other as if that state had issued it. And you do not have to register it in the new state first — registration is optional, not a precondition to enforcement.
The same section also says the enforcing state must not tell the restrained person that the order has been registered there unless the protected person asks it to, and must not publish anything online that would be likely to reveal the protected person’s identity or location.
The federal firearms rule needs a hearing first
This is the single most misunderstood point in the whole subject, and it cuts against what most people assume. The federal prohibition at 18 U.S.C. s. 922(g)(8) reaches a person subject to an order only where three things are true: the order was made after a hearing of which they had actual notice and at which they had a chance to take part; it restrains them in relation to an intimate partner or that partner’s child; and it either carries a credible-threat finding or expressly forbids the use of force.
So an emergency or ex parte order does not trigger the federal prohibition on its own — there has been no hearing yet. State law may go further, and many states do, which is why the state rule is set out on this page separately. In United States v. Rahimi (2024) the Supreme Court upheld s. 922(g)(8), holding that “When an individual has been found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the Second Amendment.”
This rule is narrower than it looks, and the detail matters. Who counts as an “intimate partner” is a defined term that excludes dating partners you never lived with; the two halves of the third condition are not equally settled after Rahimi; and there is a separate federal route based on convictions rather than orders, which does reach dating partners. We set all of it out, quoted from the United States Code, on one page: Guns and protection orders — the federal rule.
How does this state compare? Ten states do nothing at all about firearms on a protection order; fourteen prohibit possession but give the court no way to collect them. All fifty side by side: which states actually take the guns.
You should not be charged for this — in any state
This is settled, and it is worth knowing before you walk into a courthouse. Under 34 U.S.C. s. 10450, a state applying for STOP grant funding must certify to the Attorney General that its "laws, policies, and practices do not require" a victim to bear the costs associated with the filing, issuance, registration, modification, enforcement, dismissal, withdrawal or service of a protection order or a petition for one — nor the costs of filing criminal charges, or of warrants and witness subpoenas. A jurisdiction that does charge has its funds withheld and redistributed to the states that do not.
Every state receives STOP funding and every state has certified compliance. The practical consequence, in the words of the National Center on Protection Orders and Full Faith & Credit, is that victims "should not be required to pay such costs in any state". That covers having the papers served on the other person, which is the charge people are most often asked for.
Two honest qualifications. The provision does not stop a court charging the respondent — many states order costs against them, and that is permitted. And it is a funding condition rather than a direct federal ban, so what a clerk does on a given day can still be wrong. If you are asked to pay a fee for any of the things listed above, you can say that your state has certified under 34 U.S.C. s. 10450 that it does not charge for them. Advocates can also raise it with the National Center on Protection Orders and Full Faith & Credit on 1-800-903-0111, prompt 2.
Where this state’s own statute says so expressly, that is quoted above.
Authority: Miss. Code Ann. tit. 93, ch. 21, art. 1, the Protection from Domestic Abuse Law. Definitions at s. 93-21-3. Temporary and final domestic abuse protection orders, relief, duration, the Protection Order Registry and modification at s. 93-21-15. Violation at s. 93-21-21. Checked 29 Aug 2026.
How we checked this page
Every quotation on this page was read in the source named in the Authority line above, not taken from a summary or another website. On this date we also re-checked every section cited for repeal, renumbering or amendment since 2024 — the sweep that caught North Dakota’s chapter being repealed and replaced, and Nebraska’s moving to an entirely new title.
One thing we could not do, and we would rather say so:
- Justia’s 2024 Mississippi Code page for s. 93-21-15 returned an HTTP 403 and would not open. Mississippi is the one state where we could not reach an official state server at all — the Legislature’s own sites fail TLS certificate verification, and the Code’s official electronic home is a JavaScript container we cannot read. The text described above was confirmed across two independent reproductions, but we have not verified it against an official Mississippi source, and we would rather say so than imply a certainty we do not have.
What we cannot promise is that nothing has changed since this date. Quote the words with confidence; check a section number before you put it in a filing. And if anything here does not match what a clerk or judge tells you, the court is right and we are wrong — tell us and we will fix it.
We keep a public record of every time we have got the law wrong on these pages, what caused it, and how long it was live: where we were wrong.
If there are children
What Mississippi presumes about custody, and the emergency jurisdiction that exists when someone has to leave the state.