The rest of what we have written about Alabama. Every figure is quoted from Alabama’s own statute or its courts’ own published schedule, and carries the date we last checked it.
Protective orders and restraining orders in Alabama
Who can ask for one, what you have to show, what a judge can order, what it costs, and what happens if it is broken — quoted from Alabama’s own statutes, not summarized.
See a different stateAlabama
Alabama issues protection orders under the Protection From Abuse Act at chapter 5 of title 30 of the Code. A judge can make an ex parte order without notice or a hearing where abuse appears from the petition, and a final protection order follows a hearing. The important thing about an Alabama final order is its duration, and it is unusual enough to put first: it is permanent by default.
The short version8 points · tap one to jump to it
- The order after a hearing — Read that again, because it inverts what nearly every other state does.
- Can I get something today? — That is a plainer test than the immediate-and-present-danger formulations several states use.
- What the judge can actually order — A final order can go further: specifying visitation with safety conditions, attorney’s fees, possession of the residence, and temporary support payments.
- Does this cover me? — Alabama does not apply a general test of abuse.
- If they break it — Section 30-5-9, the penalties section of the Protection From Abuse Act, was repealed by Act 2010-538 with effect from 1 July 2010.
- Who can file in Alabama, and the timetable — You do not have to have been abused yet.
- Firearms in Alabama: the ban is real, but it is not in the Protection From Abuse Act
- The part that is the same in every state — This is federal law and it does not change at a state line.
In this subject 8
The order after a hearing
The short version8 points · tap one to jump to it
- The order after a hearing — Read that again, because it inverts what nearly every other state does.
- Can I get something today? — That is a plainer test than the immediate-and-present-danger formulations several states use.
- What the judge can actually order — A final order can go further: specifying visitation with safety conditions, attorney’s fees, possession of the residence, and temporary support payments.
- Does this cover me? — Alabama does not apply a general test of abuse.
- If they break it — Section 30-5-9, the penalties section of the Protection From Abuse Act, was repealed by Act 2010-538 with effect from 1 July 2010.
- Who can file in Alabama, and the timetable — You do not have to have been abused yet.
- Firearms in Alabama: the ban is real, but it is not in the Protection From Abuse Act
- The part that is the same in every state — This is federal law and it does not change at a state line.
In this subject 8
Permanent by default
Alabama does something only a handful of states do, and it does it as the default rather than as an exception you have to argue for.
Read that again, because it inverts what nearly every other state does. An Alabama final protection order does not run for a year, or two, or five. It is permanent from the moment it is made, unless the court says otherwise or a later order changes it.
There is no renewal date to diary and no window to miss. On this site only New Jersey, Colorado and Alabama put a protected person in that position without her having to ask for it.
The words "unless otherwise specified" still matter. A court can put an end date on the order. So when the order is made, read what it actually says about duration — and if it carries an expiry date, that is a departure from the default and worth raising at the time rather than discovering later.
Can I get something today?
The ex parte standard
That is a plainer test than the immediate-and-present-danger formulations several states use. A judge can act without notice or hearing where abuse appears from the petition.
A final protection order follows after notice under the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure and a hearing.
What the judge can actually order
The statutory relief
An Alabama order can enjoin abuse and harassment, impose a 300-foot distance requirement from your residence, school or workplace, award temporary custody, remove the defendant from the residence, give you possession of a vehicle and personal property, and prohibit the defendant from transferring or disposing of property.
A final order can go further: specifying visitation with safety conditions, attorney’s fees, possession of the residence, and temporary support payments.
The property-disposal provision is worth asking about if there is any risk of assets being moved or sold while things are unresolved.
Does this cover me?
What counts as abuse — a list of crimes
Alabama does not apply a general test of abuse. Like New Jersey, it defines abuse by pointing at a list of criminal offenses, and the list is long. Section 30-5-2 includes:
Arson. Assault. Attempt. Child abuse, torture, willful abuse of a child, aggravated child abuse and chemical endangerment. Criminal coercion. Criminal trespass. Harassment. Kidnapping. Menacing. Reckless endangerment. Sexual offenses. Stalking. Theft. Unlawful imprisonment.
Several of those cover conduct people do not associate with a protection order. Theft — taking your things. Criminal trespass — coming into your home or onto your property. Menacing and reckless endangerment, neither of which requires you to have been touched. Unlawful imprisonment — being stopped from leaving.
And then the provision that keeps the list from being a ceiling:
Anything that could be punished as a criminal act. If what is being done to you is a crime, it is abuse for the purposes of an Alabama protection order, whether or not it appears on the list.
Standing to petition is dealt with at s. 30-5-5, and covers people connected by marriage, a child in common, a dating relationship, household membership, family relationship, or a parent-child or stepparent-stepchild connection.
If they break it
The section most guidance still cites was repealed
A housekeeping point that matters, because it appears in a good deal of published material about Alabama. Section 30-5-9, the penalties section of the Protection From Abuse Act, was repealed by Act 2010-538 with effect from 1 July 2010. If a guide cites 30-5-9 for what a violation carries, it is roughly a decade and a half out of date.
The offense now lives in the criminal code, in the Domestic Violence Protection Order Enforcement Act:
Note the two limbs. Doing something the order prohibits, and willfully failing to do something the order requires. An order that tells him to hand something over or to stay away from a place is broken by inaction as much as by action.
A first violation is a Class A misdemeanor.
On a second conviction there is a mandatory minimum of 30 days’ imprisonment which cannot be suspended, in addition to any other penalty or fine.
A third or subsequent violation is a Class C felony.
The court must also impose a $50 fine paid to the Domestic Violence Trust Fund on every conviction.
The escalation is worth understanding in advance, because it depends on convictions rather than incidents. A violation that is never reported never counts toward the second or third.
Who can file in Alabama, and the timetable
Standing — Ala. Code § 30-5-5(a)
“(1) A person who is at least 18 years old or is otherwise emancipated and is the victim of abuse, as defined in Section 30-5-2, or has reasonable cause to believe he or she is in imminent danger of becoming the victim of any act of abuse.”
Read the second half of that sentence. You do not have to have been abused yet. Reasonable cause to believe you are in imminent danger of it is standing in its own right. That matters if you are trying to leave before something happens rather than after.
“(2) A parent, legal guardian, next friend, court-appointed guardian ad litem, or the State Department of Human Resources may petition for relief on behalf of the following: a. A minor child. b. Any person prevented by physical or mental incapacity from seeking a protection order.”
Note “next friend” — you do not have to be a parent or a formal guardian to file for a child or for an adult who cannot file for themselves.
Three business days, then ten — § 30-5-6
“The court shall grant or deny a petition for a temporary ex parte protection order filed under this chapter within three business days of the filing of the petition. Any granted temporary ex parte protection order shall be effective until the final hearing date.”
“The court shall hold a hearing after the filing of a petition under this chapter upon the request of the defendant or within 10 days of the perfection of service.” The standard is preponderance of the evidence. “If the defendant has not been served, a final hearing may be continued to allow for service to be perfected.”
The ten days runs from service, not from filing. And because the ex parte order lasts “until the final hearing date,” a continuance for service does not leave you exposed — subsection (c) lets the court make or extend the temporary order as reasonably necessary.
The ex parte standard is “good cause shown”, to protect against abuse “or the immediate and present danger of abuse.” Under § 30-5-7 the court may issue an ex parte order “without notice or hearing, immediately”, and may make a final order after notice “whether or not the defendant appears.” Their non-attendance does not stop you getting a final order.
Firearms in Alabama: the ban is real, but it is not in the Protection From Abuse Act
We had this wrong on an earlier version of this page and we are correcting it. Alabama does prohibit firearm possession by a person subject to a protection order — the provision simply is not in title 30 chapter 5, which is where anyone would look for it.
The prohibition — Ala. Code § 13A-11-72(a)(1)
It sits in the criminal code, among the general firearms disqualifications:
“No person who has been convicted in this state or elsewhere of committing or attempting to commit a crime of violence, misdemeanor offense of domestic violence, violent offense as listed in Section 12-25-32(15), anyone who is subject to a valid protection order for domestic abuse, or anyone of unsound mind shall own a firearm or have one in his or her possession or under his or her control.”
Three things follow, and all of them are good news:
- It covers owning, possessing and controlling — not just carrying.
- It is mandatory and automatic. It attaches by operation of law the moment a qualifying order issues. No judge has to tick a box, and you do not have to ask.
- Violation is a Class C felony under § 13A-11-72(a)(2) — a state charge, quite apart from the federal one.
But read the definition of “valid protection order” carefully
Section 13A-11-72(h)(8) defines the term, and it tracks the federal standard almost word for word. The order must have been “issued after a hearing of which the person received actual notice and at which the person had an opportunity to participate”, and must either restrain them from harassing, stalking or threatening a qualified person or child “and … include a finding that the person represents a credible threat to the physical safety” of that person, or “by its terms, explicitly prohibit the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force” reasonably expected to cause bodily injury.
So the ban is post-hearing only. An ex parte order under § 30-5-7(b) does not trigger it, because there has been no hearing. If you are holding a temporary Alabama order, § 13A-11-72 does not yet apply to the person it restrains — and neither does the federal rule, for the same reason. That window between the ex parte order and the final hearing is the one to be most careful in.
The practical step is the same one the federal statute rewards: ask the judge for an express finding that the respondent represents a credible threat to your physical safety, and to write it into the final order. That single sentence engages both the Alabama felony and the federal prohibition.
What Alabama still does not have
There is no surrender or relinquishment procedure anywhere in Alabama law. No deadline, no recipient, no receipt, no certification. Nobody is required to hand anything over and nobody checks. The ban is enforced only by prosecution after the fact, if possession is discovered.
Nor is there a notification requirement — Alabama does not oblige the court to tell the respondent they have just become a prohibited person.
So the shape of it is: a strong prohibition, a serious penalty, and no machinery. Which makes the same three things matter as everywhere else — get a final order made after a hearing, get the credible-threat finding written into it, and tell law enforcement what firearms exist and where they are kept.
The part that is the same in every state
An order from one state works in all of them
This is federal law and it does not change at a state line. An order issued by one state, tribe or territory must be enforced by every other as if that state had issued it. And you do not have to register it in the new state first — registration is optional, not a precondition to enforcement.
The same section also says the enforcing state must not tell the restrained person that the order has been registered there unless the protected person asks it to, and must not publish anything online that would be likely to reveal the protected person’s identity or location.
The federal firearms rule needs a hearing first
This is the single most misunderstood point in the whole subject, and it cuts against what most people assume. The federal prohibition at 18 U.S.C. s. 922(g)(8) reaches a person subject to an order only where three things are true: the order was made after a hearing of which they had actual notice and at which they had a chance to take part; it restrains them in relation to an intimate partner or that partner’s child; and it either carries a credible-threat finding or expressly forbids the use of force.
So an emergency or ex parte order does not trigger the federal prohibition on its own — there has been no hearing yet. State law may go further, and many states do, which is why the state rule is set out on this page separately. In United States v. Rahimi (2024) the Supreme Court upheld s. 922(g)(8), holding that “[a]n individual found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the Second Amendment.”
This rule is narrower than it looks, and the detail matters. Who counts as an “intimate partner” is a defined term that excludes dating partners you never lived with; the two halves of the third condition are not equally settled after Rahimi; and there is a separate federal route based on convictions rather than orders, which does reach dating partners. We set all of it out, quoted from the United States Code, on one page: Guns and protection orders — the federal rule.
How does this state compare? Ten states do nothing at all about firearms on a protection order; fourteen prohibit possession but give the court no way to collect them. All fifty side by side: which states actually take the guns.
You should not be charged for this — in any state
This is settled, and it is worth knowing before you walk into a courthouse. Under 34 U.S.C. s. 10450, a state applying for STOP grant funding must certify to the Attorney General that its "laws, policies, and practices do not require" a victim to bear the costs associated with the filing, issuance, registration, modification, enforcement, dismissal, withdrawal or service of a protection order or a petition for one — nor the costs of filing criminal charges, or of warrants and witness subpoenas. A jurisdiction that does charge has its funds withheld and redistributed to the states that do not.
Every state receives STOP funding and every state has certified compliance. The practical consequence, in the words of the National Center on Protection Orders and Full Faith & Credit, is that victims "should not be required to pay such costs in any state". That covers having the papers served on the other person, which is the charge people are most often asked for.
Two honest qualifications. The provision does not stop a court charging the respondent — many states order costs against them, and that is permitted. And it is a funding condition rather than a direct federal ban, so what a clerk does on a given day can still be wrong. If you are asked to pay a fee for any of the things listed above, you can say that your state has certified under 34 U.S.C. s. 10450 that it does not charge for them. Advocates can also raise it with the National Center on Protection Orders and Full Faith & Credit on 1-800-903-0111, prompt 2.
Where this state’s own statute says so expressly, that is quoted above.
Authority: Ala. Code tit. 30, ch. 5, the Protection From Abuse Act. Definitions at s. 30-5-2. Standing at s. 30-5-5. Hearings and temporary orders at s. 30-5-6. Ex parte orders, final orders, duration and relief at s. 30-5-7. The former penalties section, s. 30-5-9, was repealed by Act 2010-538 effective 1 July 2010; the offense now sits at Ala. Code s. 13A-6-142, part of the Domestic Violence Protection Order Enforcement Act. — read it on Alabama’s own site. Checked 29 Aug 2026.
How we checked this page
Every quotation above was read in the source named in the Authority line, not taken from a summary or another website. Where a source would not open, we say so at the point we relied on something else.
On this date we also re-checked every section cited above for repeal, renumbering or amendment since 2024. That sweep is not decorative: it is what caught North Dakota’s protection order chapter being repealed and replaced, Nebraska’s moving to an entirely new title, and a dozen 2025 and 2026 amendments that most published guidance has not yet picked up.
Nothing is outstanding on the main questions for Alabama. What we cannot promise is that nothing has changed since this date. Quote the words with confidence; check a section number before you put it in a filing. And if anything here does not match what a clerk or judge tells you, the court is right and we are wrong — tell us and we will fix it.
We keep a public record of every time we have got the law wrong on these pages, what caused it, and how long it was live: where we were wrong.
If there are children
What Alabama presumes about custody, and the emergency jurisdiction that exists when someone has to leave the state.