Prenups · procedure, not wording · 2026-08-20

The prenup checklist.

What to do, in what order, starting twelve months before the wedding. This is the part that decides whether the agreement survives.

Almost every article about prenups is about what to put in one. This page is about the order you do things in, because that is what a court actually examines when someone tries to tear the agreement up fifteen years later.

The single most useful sentence on this site

Start twelve months before the wedding, not three. Every procedural protection below — real disclosure, two separate lawyers, time to think, a signature that is not made under the weight of a paid-for venue — costs nothing extra if you start early and becomes impossible if you start late. Time is the cheapest input and the one people spend first.

The short version7 points · tap one to jump to it
  1. Twelve to six months out
  2. The disclosure schedule — do this properly or do not bother
  3. Six to three months out
  4. The signing
  5. After the wedding
  6. State by state: what can undo it — These are the rules that change by state — a waiting period written into the statute, whether a lawyer is required, and how the state treats a waiver of spousal support, which is the clause most likely to be thrown out.
  7. Red flags that should stop you signing — All of them make an agreement vulnerable, which is bad for both of you — an agreement that gets thrown out protects nobody, and the person who insisted on the rush is usually the person it was supposed to protect.
In this subject 7

Twelve to six months out

  • Both of you say out loud what the agreement is for. Protecting a family business, a prior marriage’s children, a professional practice, an inheritance, one person’s student debt. If you cannot articulate the purpose in a sentence, you are not ready to draft, and a court reading the agreement later will not be able to see the purpose either. The agreements that survive tend to have an obvious reason for existing. The ones that read as a general grab tend not to.
  • Each of you hires your own lawyer. Not one lawyer “who will be fair to both of us.” Two. In California, an agreement is presumed involuntary unless the challenging party either had independent counsel or expressly waived counsel in a separate writing after being advised to get one. In Minnesota, separate counsel is mandatory for a postnup. In Colorado and North Dakota, being denied access to counsel is a standalone ground to void. If the wealthier party is paying for both lawyers, that is common and generally fine — but the second lawyer must be chosen by, and answerable to, the other person.
  • Build the disclosure schedule before anyone drafts a clause. This is the step people skip and it is the one that kills agreements. See the next section.

The disclosure schedule — do this properly or do not bother

A prenup is an agreement to give something up. A court will not enforce a giving-up by someone who did not know what they were giving up. What counts as “knowing” is where states diverge sharply.

  • List every asset with a real number and a date. “Various brokerage accounts” is not disclosure. “Schwab account ending 4471, $312,880 as of 14 March 2026” is.
  • Value the illiquid things honestly, and say how you valued them. A private business at book value is the single most common disclosure failure. If a real valuation is not practical, say so in the schedule and say what basis you used — a stated method beats a bare number.
  • Do not omit the things that have not happened yet. Unvested equity, a pending inheritance, a deferred bonus, an expected distribution. These are exactly what the fight will be about in twenty years.
  • List the debts too. Disclosure runs to “property and financial obligations” in almost every statute. Undisclosed debt cuts against the person who hid it just as much as undisclosed wealth.
  • Attach the schedule to the agreement and have both people initial every page. Then keep a complete signed counterpart each, with the schedule attached. An agreement whose schedule cannot be produced later is an agreement with no disclosure.
  • Know which standard your state uses, because it changes the stakes enormously. Under the 1983 uniform act, a disclosure failure alone is not enough — the challenger must also prove the whole agreement was unconscionable when signed. Under the 2012 act (Colorado, North Dakota) and in states like Iowa and Connecticut, inadequate disclosure is a standalone ground. Utah is the far end: it requires proof of fraud, not mere unfairness.

Six to three months out

  • Exchange drafts in writing and keep every version. A negotiation record with both sides’ markups is powerful evidence that the agreement was bargained rather than handed over. Its absence is evidence of the opposite.
  • Make sure the weaker-position party asks for changes, and gets some. An agreement that came back unchanged from the other side looks like an ultimatum in hindsight, even when it was not.
  • Decide the spousal support question deliberately. This is the clause with four different legal answers depending on your state — void in Iowa, floored by public assistance in most, requiring independent counsel in California, entirely unfloored in South Dakota. Read your state’s row on the main guide.
  • Talk about a sunset or a step-down. Not required anywhere, but agreements that soften over a long marriage — a waiver that erodes after ten years, a fixed payment that grows with the years married — are dramatically easier to defend later, and they are the honest answer to “this was fair in 1999 and grotesque in 2026.”

The signing

  • Sign at least thirty days before the wedding, and further out if you can. Only California and Minnesota put a number in the statute, and both use seven days. Treat seven as a floor that two states happen to have written down, not as a target. Everywhere else timing is evidence of duress, and a month of daylight is cheap insurance. California’s seven days runs from first presentation of the final agreement to signing, and since 1 January 2020 it applies even if you had your own excellent lawyer. Minnesota’s seven days runs to the wedding and shifts the burden of proof rather than voiding outright.
  • Sign on different days, in different rooms, each with your own lawyer present. Free, and it removes the whole picture of one person signing under the other’s eye.
  • Get the formalities exactly right for your state. New York is the trap here: signatures must be acknowledged to the standard required to record a deed. A merely witnessed New York prenup is not a prenup.
  • Have each lawyer write a short letter confirming they advised their own client. Not required by statute anywhere we found. Enormously useful fifteen years later when the question is whether advice was actually given.
  • Both of you keep an original. Store them separately.

After the wedding

  • Actually live by it. Commingling the separate account the agreement says is separate is the quiet way people undo their own prenup. If the agreement says an account stays yours, do not run joint expenses through it.
  • Revisit it when something structural changes. A child, a career ended to raise that child, a business sold, a move to another state. A move matters more than people expect — you may have signed under one state’s rules and be divorcing under another’s.
  • Amend only in a signed writing. Every statute we read requires it, and every statute we read makes an amendment enforceable without new consideration. Nothing informal counts.

State by state: what can undo it

The steps above work everywhere. These are the rules that change by state — a waiting period written into the statute, whether a lawyer is required, and how the state treats a waiver of spousal support, which is the clause most likely to be thrown out. Two states put a number of days in the statute; California goes furthest on counsel, and three states void a support waiver outright.

Support waiver
StateWaiting periodIndependent counselSupport waiverWatch for
Alabamanone in statutenot addressed by statuteEnforced as writtenNo statute. The burden sits on the spouse relying on the agreement, so a waiver signed without a lawyer or full disclosure is exposed. source
Alaskanone in statutenot requiredUnsettledBrooks was a property case. No Alaska Supreme Court decision on an alimony waiver was found. source
Arizonanone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorThe override lifts support to the public-assistance line, not to a normal alimony award. source
Arkansas——Enforced, with a public-assistance floorWaiving disclosure without a lawyer does not count. source
California7 dayseffectively requiredJudged again at divorceNo lawyer at signing and the waiver fails outright. With one, a judge can still refuse it at divorce. source
Coloradonone in statuterequired in substance — access to counselJudged again at divorceJudged by the circumstances at divorce. No public-assistance clause – the unconscionability test does that work. source
Connecticutnone in statuterequired in substance — a reasonable opportunity to consultJudged again at divorceA waiver that has become unconscionable by the divorce can be struck. source
Delawarenone in statutenot requiredEnforced as writtenDelaware left out the uniform act’s public-assistance safety valve. source
District of Columbianone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorSupport only up to the public-assistance line. source
Floridanone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorA judge can still order support during the divorce, whatever the prenup says. source
Georgia——Judged again at divorceA properly signed waiver can still fall if life has changed enough since signing. source
Hawaiinone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorThe only safety net is public assistance, not general unfairness. source
Idahonone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorA spouse left poorer but not public-assistance-eligible gets no relief. source
Illinoisnone in statutenot requiredJudged again at divorceUnforeseen hardship, such as a disability, can override the waiver. Foreseeable hardship cannot. source
Indiana——Judged again at divorce‘Extreme’ hardship is a higher bar than Illinois’s ‘undue’ hardship. source
Iowanone in statutenot requiredCannot be waivedAn alimony waiver in an Iowa prenup is unenforceable however fair it looked when signed. It also voids waivers of attorney fees tied to support. source
Kansasnone in statutenot addressed by statuteEnforced, with a public-assistance floorThe waiver stands unless it would leave a spouse on public assistance. source
Kentuckynone in statutenot addressed by statuteJudged again at divorceFairness is checked again at divorce, not only at signing. source
Louisiananone in statutenot required by the Code textUnsettledSupport during the divorce is available even after waiving ‘all’ support. source
Mainenone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorAgreements signed before 1 October 1993 could lapse 18 months after the couple had a child unless reaffirmed in writing. source
Marylandnone in statutenot required by statuteEnforced as writtenBecause engaged couples are treated as being in a relationship of trust, the burden is on the spouse enforcing it. source
Massachusettsnone in statutenot required by statuteJudged again at divorceA waiver that was fair at signing can still be set aside at divorce. source
Michigannone in statutenot addressed by statuteJudged again at divorceA Michigan judge can still award support from either spouse’s assets if the needier spouse’s share is not enough to live on. source
Minnesota7 daysa meaningful opportunity to consult counsel is requiredJudged again at divorceSkip the seven days or the witnesses and the whole agreement is at risk. source
Mississippi——Enforced as writtenA waiver that turned out worse than expected will generally stand. source
Missourinone in statutenot required by statuteEnforced as writtenA large income gap alone will not void the agreement if disclosure and process were fair. source
Montananone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorSupport only up to the public-assistance line. source
Nebraskanone in statutenot required, but weighedEnforced, with a public-assistance floorThe waiver holds unless it would push the spouse onto public assistance. source
Nevadanone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorJudged at signing, not at divorce. source
New Hampshirenone in statutenot required by statuteJudged again at divorceA big enough change in circumstances can undo the waiver. source
New Jerseynone in statutean express statutory factorEnforced as writtenSince 2013, a waiver that became harsh by the divorce cannot be attacked on that ground. source
New Mexico——Cannot be waivedA New Mexico prenup cannot waive or reduce spousal support at all. source
New Yorknone in statutenot required by statuteJudged again at divorceChecked twice, and a missing notary acknowledgment can void the whole agreement. source
North Carolinanone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorNorth Carolina adds a dependent-spouse finding before the override applies. source
North Dakotanone in statuterequired in substance — access to counselJudged again at divorceThe hardship review applies to any term, not only support. source
Ohionone in statutenot required by statuteJudged again at divorceSupport terms that were fair when signed can be rewritten at divorce. source
Oklahomanone in statutenot addressed by statuteUnsettledNo Oklahoma Supreme Court holding on alimony waivers. source
Oregonnone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorOregon’s floor also covers medical assistance. source
Pennsylvanianone in statutenot requiredEnforced as writtenCourts will not ask whether the terms are reasonable. A lopsided waiver stands if disclosure was adequate. source
Rhode Islandnone in statutenot requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floor‘And’ where every other state says ‘or’ – among the hardest prenups in the country to challenge. source
South Carolinanone in statutestrongly encouraged by statuteJudged again at divorceChanges the spouse could foresee – expected health decline, for instance – did not defeat the waiver. source
South Dakotanone in statutenot addressed by statuteCannot be waivedEven a limit on support, not only a full waiver, is void. The property terms can survive. source
Tennessee——Enforced, with a public-assistance floorThe public-charge floor comes from the court, not the statute. source
Texasnone in statutenot requiredEnforced as writtenNo public-assistance override, and common-law defenses are expressly excluded. source
Utahnone in statutenot addressed by statuteEnforced, with a public-assistance floorUtah’s test is ‘fraudulent’, not ‘unconscionable’, and the section was renumbered on 1 September 2024. source
Vermontnone in statutenot addressed by statuteEnforced, with a public-assistance floorIn 2025 the Vermont Supreme Court reversed a trial court that had struck a full maintenance waiver. source
Virginianone in statutenot requiredEnforced as writtenNo public-assistance override – Virginia left that clause out. source
Washingtonnone in statutenot required by statuteEnforced as writtenA one-sided support bar makes the agreement unfair, and then the procedure has to be spotless. source
West Virginianone in statutenot required by statuteEnforced as writtenWithout a lawyer on each side, the presumption flips onto the spouse enforcing it. source
Wisconsinnone in statuteexpressly not requiredEnforced, with a public-assistance floorWithout an explicit maintenance waiver, the court can still award maintenance. source
Wyomingnone in statutenot addressed by statuteUnsettledNo Wyoming Supreme Court holding on an alimony waiver specifically. source

Waiting period and counsel columns from our state-by-state statute table; a dash means we could not confirm that state from an official source. Support-waiver column from the alimony waiver research. All read 21 September 2026.

Red flags that should stop you signing

If any of these is true, do not sign this week

You are being asked to sign inside a month of the wedding · you have not seen a complete list of the other person’s assets and debts · you have no lawyer, or your lawyer was picked and paid for by your fiancé’s family · you are told “it’s standard, you don’t need to read it” · you are told your questions are a sign you don’t trust them · the schedule of assets has values you know to be wrong · you are being asked to waive something and you cannot say what it is worth.

None of these makes anyone a bad person. All of them make an agreement vulnerable, which is bad for both of you — an agreement that gets thrown out protects nobody, and the person who insisted on the rush is usually the person it was supposed to protect.

Now the substance

Annotated clause language, with commentary on what holds and what does not.

Read the clauses →

Read this part

The Cusp is not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice. This is an explanation of how these agreements work and where they fall apart, written so you can have a better conversation with a lawyer — not so you can skip having one. Prenups are one of the few documents where doing it yourself reliably costs more than it saves, because the thing that voids them is almost never the wording. It is the process.

Every rule below is cited to a statute and linked to the state’s own text. Where we could not confirm a state, we say so instead of filling it in.

Know someone in someone staring at this number?

A straight answer about money is more useful than most advice, and it costs nothing to pass along. Nothing here asks for their real name, and nobody finds out they looked.

Sources last checked20 August 2026
Page published20 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.