Guardians ad litem and child representation in Nevada: who they are, what they owe your child, and who pays

Nevada is one of the states where this question does not have a clean statutory answer. That is a finding, not a gap in our research, and it is explained below.

How this page is sourced

Everything below is traced to Nevada’s own statute or court rule, quoted where the wording matters. Where we could not verify something from a primary source, the page says so in plain terms rather than filling the space. This is information, not legal advice. Corrections go up at thecusp.app/corrections.

Duty owed
Best interests
Advocates for what they judge is best for the child — not necessarily what the child wants.
Who can serve
Not established
We could not confirm this from a primary source.
Who pays
Not established
No fee-allocation provision found in statute.
Official rate
No published rate
No official fee schedule exists that we could find.

How an appointment happens

No appointment statute found

We searched Nevada’s custody statutes and could not find a provision authorizing the appointment of a guardian ad litem or an attorney for the child in a private custody case — as opposed to abuse, neglect or dependency proceedings, which are governed separately. Where that is the case, appointments are usually made under local court practice rather than statute, and the answer is genuinely local. Ask the clerk of your county’s family court.

What duty they owe your child

best interests (as to the court’s own custody determination)

In the statute’s own words
In determining the best interest of the child, the court shall consider and set forth its specific findings concerning, among other things: (a) The wishes of the child if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference as to his or her physical custody.

Who can be appointed

Chapter 125C (Custody of Children) of the Nevada Revised Statutes, retrieved directly from the Nevada Legislature’s site, contains no occurrence of the phrase ‘guardian ad litem’ and no provision naming or defining a role for a child’s own appointed representative in a private custody case. This research could not locate the Nevada statute, if one exists, creating and defining such a role; it may be governed instead by a district court rule (e.g., Eighth Judicial District Court Rules) that we could not retrieved with the tools available.

Who pays

No fee-allocation provision found

We could not find a Nevada statute or rule governing how the appointee’s fee is split between the parties. In practice the cost still falls on the parents in most private cases — the allocation is simply made under the court’s general costs power rather than a dedicated provision. Ask how the fee will be allocated before the appointment order is entered, not after.

There is no published price

We looked for an official Nevada fee schedule for privately appointed guardians ad litem and custody evaluators, and did not find one. That is true of almost every state — only Minnesota and Massachusetts publish figures, and both are subsidised program rates rather than market ones.

The numbers circulating online come from law-firm marketing pages. We will not repeat those as though they were sourced. Call your county family court clerk and ask what appointees there actually charge. It is local, current, and free.

Custody evaluations

Nevada governs court-ordered custody evaluations and investigations separately from the appointment of a guardian ad litem. An evaluator is a witness, not an advocate — and their recommendation is a recommendation, not a ruling a judge is bound by.

Source: Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.002 · source

Before an evaluation begins, it is worth asking which psychological instruments will be used. The peer-reviewed literature is openly critical of several still in circulation — one has interrater reliability reported as ranging from 50% to 100%. The evidence, in full.

The thing worth knowing about Nevada

Nevada’s custody statute (NRS 125C.002) authorizes the court to order an investigation only ‘for assistance in determining whether an award of joint physical custody is appropriate’ — a narrower trigger than most states, which authorize custody investigations/evaluations generally in any contested case, not only where joint physical custody is at issue.

What we could not verify

For Nevada we could not confirm the following from a primary source, and we would rather say so than guess:

  • the appointment provision
  • whether the appointee must be a lawyer
  • how the fee is allocated

If you practice in Nevada and can point us at the right provision, tell us. Corrections are published with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.

Other states

Related

Sources last checked29 August 2026
Page published29 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.