More on South Dakota

The rest of what we have written about South Dakota. Every figure is quoted from South Dakota’s own statute or its courts’ own published schedule, and carries the date we last checked it.

Guardians ad litem and child representation in South Dakota: who they are, what they owe your child, and who pays

If custody is contested in South Dakota, the court can appoint someone to look into your family and report to the judge. This page is what South Dakota’s own statutes and court rules say about who that person is, what duty they owe, and — the part almost nobody asks in time — who pays for them.

How this page is sourced

Everything below is traced to South Dakota’s own statute or court rule, quoted where the wording matters. Where we could not verify something from a primary source, the page says so in plain terms rather than filling the space. This is information, not legal advice. Corrections go up at thecusp.app/corrections.

Duty owed
Best interests
Advocates for what they judge is best for the child — not necessarily what the child wants.
Who can serve
Depends on the role
This state has more than one appointee role with different requirements.
Who pays
The parties, by court order
Allocated between you at the court’s discretion.
Official rate
Not established
We could not confirm one either way.
The short version7 points · tap one to jump to it
  1. What the role is called here — A guardian ad litem generally argues for what they judge is best for your child and is not your child’s lawyer.
  2. How an appointment happens
  3. What duty they owe your child
  4. Who can be appointed — The statute appoints 'counsel' (an attorney) for the child, but separately allows the court to designate additional, non-attorney persons to assist: 'The court may designate other persons who may or may not be attorneys' to assist with these duties.
  5. Who pays — We looked for an official South Dakota fee schedule for privately appointed guardians ad litem and custody evaluators, and did not find one.
  6. Custody evaluations — South Dakota governs court-ordered custody evaluations and investigations separately from the appointment of a guardian ad litem.
  7. The thing worth knowing about South Dakota
In this subject 9

What the role is called here

counsel for the child

Names matter more than they look. A guardian ad litem generally argues for what they judge is best for your child and is not your child’s lawyer. An attorney for the child argues for what your child actually wants. Those are opposite duties. The four roles, explained in full.

How an appointment happens

SDCL § 25-4-45.4
the court may appoint counsel for any child involved in any divorce or custody proceeding

Source: SDCL § 25-4-45.4 · source

What duty they owe your child

best interests

In the statute’s own words
The counsel shall be charged with representation of the child’s best interests

Source: SDCL § 25-4-45.4 · source

Who can be appointed

The statute appoints ‘counsel’ (an attorney) for the child, but separately allows the court to designate additional, non-attorney persons to assist: ‘The court may designate other persons who may or may not be attorneys’ to assist with these duties. SDCL § 25-4-45.4.

Who pays

SDCL § 25-4-45.4
The court shall allocate the cost of the appointed counsel between the parents, guardians, or custodians involved

Source: SDCL § 25-4-45.4 · source

There is no published price

We looked for an official South Dakota fee schedule for privately appointed guardians ad litem and custody evaluators, and did not find one. That is true of most states — only a handful publish figures at all, among them Arkansas, Massachusetts and Minnesota, and those are subsidized program rates rather than market ones.

The numbers circulating online come from law-firm marketing pages. We will not repeat those as though they were sourced. Call your county family court clerk and ask what appointees there actually charge. It is local, current, and free.

Custody evaluations

South Dakota governs court-ordered custody evaluations and investigations separately from the appointment of a guardian ad litem. An evaluator is a witness, not an advocate — and their recommendation is a recommendation, not a ruling a judge is bound by.

Source: SDCL § 25-4A-23 (Home study or custody evaluation–Mediation) · source

Before an evaluation begins, it is worth asking which psychological instruments will be used. The peer-reviewed literature is openly critical of several still in circulation — one has interrater reliability reported as ranging from 50% to 100%. The evidence, in full.

The thing worth knowing about South Dakota

South Dakota does not use ‘guardian ad litem’ terminology for private divorce/custody cases; it appoints ‘counsel’ for the child under SDCL 25-4-45.4, who represents the child’s best interests, and the statute explicitly permits the court to designate additional non-attorney persons to assist that counsel.

Other states

Related

Sources last checked29 August 2026
Page published29 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.