Alimony · Nebraska · checked 23 Aug 2026

Alimony in Nebraska.

Whether the state sets a formula or leaves it to the judge, what the court has to weigh, how long it runs, and what brings it to an end.

Does Nebraska have an alimony formula?
No. The judge decides it on the factors.

There is no arithmetic in Nebraska’s statute. The court decides the amount and the length from the factors below, and two judges on the same facts can reach different answers. That is not a flaw in how we are describing it; it is how the law is written.

Use the state’s own words

Nebraska calls it alimony. Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-365 is captioned 'Decree; alimony; division of property; criteria; modification; revocation; termination' and uses 'alimony' throughout. Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-351(1) uses the more general phrase 'the support of either party' for temporary and final orders.. Using the state’s own term matters when you are searching for forms or reading an order — the words are not interchangeable across state lines, and some of them mean different things in different places.

What the law actually says

The power the court has

Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-365 (alimony; criteria; modification; revocation; termination); Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-351(1) (jurisdiction to make temporary and final orders).Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-365, first sentence, quoted verbatim: 'When dissolution of a marriage is decreed, the court may order payment of such alimony by one party to the other and division of property as may be reasonable, having regard for the circumstances of the parties, duration of the marriage, a history of the contributions to the marriage by each party, including contributions to the care and education of the children, and interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities, and the ability of the supported party to engage in gainful employment without interfering with the interests of any minor children in the custody of such party.'

What the judge has to weigh

Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-365 (alimony; criteria; modification; revocation; termination); Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-351(1) (jurisdiction to make temporary and final orders). — the factorsThe criteria are embedded in the first sentence rather than set out as a list. Verbatim, the court is to act 'having regard for the circumstances of the parties, duration of the marriage, a history of the contributions to the marriage by each party, including contributions to the care and education of the children, and interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities, and the ability of the supported party to engage in gainful employment without interfering with the interests of any minor children in the custody of such party.' The section adds a second paragraph distinguishing alimony from property division, quoted verbatim: 'While the criteria for reaching a reasonable division of property and a reasonable award of alimony may overlap, the two serve different purposes and are to be considered separately. The purpose of a property division is to distribute the marital assets equitably between the parties. The purpose of alimony is to provide for the continued maintenance or support of one party by the other when the relative economic circumstances and the other criteria enumerated in this section make it appropriate.' Source: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=42-365

How long it lasts

Duration

'[D]uration of the marriage' is one of the named criteria in the first sentence of 42-365, but the statute attaches no bracket, ratio, presumption or maximum term to it. Nebraska sets no statutory duration rule.

Does behavior matter?

Marital misconduct

The statute is silent. Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-365 neither requires, permits nor bars consideration of marital misconduct. Nothing in the section makes alimony depend on either party's conduct.

When it ends, and when it can change

What brings it to an end

Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-365, quoted verbatim: 'Except as otherwise agreed by the parties in writing or by order of the court, alimony orders shall terminate upon the death of either party or the remarriage of the recipient.' There is no cohabitation provision and no retirement provision in the section.

Changing it later

Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-365 sets out an unusually specific set of limits, quoted verbatim: 'A proceeding to modify or revoke an order for alimony for good cause shall be commenced by filing a complaint to modify. Service of process and other procedure shall comply with the requirements for a dissolution action. Amounts accrued prior to the date of filing of the complaint to modify may not be modified or revoked. A decree may not be modified to award alimony if alimony was not allowed in the original decree dissolving a marriage. A decree may not be modified to award additional alimony if the entire amount of alimony allowed in the original decree had accrued before the date of filing of the complaint to modify.'

Worth knowing about Nebraska

The two closing bars in the modification paragraph are the notable feature and they are easy to miss. If the original decree awarded no alimony, no later court may add it — 'A decree may not be modified to award alimony if alimony was not allowed in the original decree'. And if the whole of the awarded alimony had already accrued before the modification complaint was filed, no more may be added. Nebraska's threshold is also stated as 'for good cause', not as a substantial change in circumstances. Nebraska has no statutory alimony formula and no statewide court-rule alimony guideline; the Nebraska Supreme Court's published guidelines in this area govern child support, not alimony.

The tax rule changed, and most guides still describe the old one

For a divorce or separation instrument executed after 31 December 2018, alimony is not deductible by the person paying it and not taxable to the person receiving it. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act repealed the provisions that made it otherwise. For an instrument executed on or before that date the old treatment continues — deductible to the payer, taxable to the recipient — unless it is later modified and the modification expressly adopts the new rule.

This is not a detail. Under the old rule a higher-rate payer could transfer income to a lower-rate recipient and the two of them shared the saving. That saving no longer exists, which changes what a given number is worth to each side. New Hampshire wrote the point into its own statute: its 23 per cent figure assumes non-deductibility, and reverts to 30 per cent if the federal treatment is ever restored.

Alongside the federal rule, Nebraska’s own income tax follows the federal treatment. That means the federal answer above is the whole answer here — no state adjustment for alimony either way. Four states do not — Arkansas, California, New Jersey and New York — so this is worth knowing rather than assuming. The fifty-state table.
Source: Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-2714; § 77-2714.01(1) the state source

Authority: Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Pub. L. 115-97, section 11051, repealing Internal Revenue Code sections 71 and 215; see also IRS Publication 504.
Authority: Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-365 (alimony; criteria; modification; revocation; termination); Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-351(1) (jurisdiction to make temporary and final orders). — read it on Nebraska’s own site. Checked 23 Aug 2026.

The other number that decides your budget

How Nebraska calculates child support, and the overnight count that moves it more than income does.

Child support →

And the question underneath it

What Nebraska presumes about custody, and what the judge has to weigh.

Custody →

Know someone in Ohio staring at this number?

A straight answer about money is more useful than most advice, and it costs nothing to pass along. Nothing here asks for their real name, and nobody finds out they looked.

More on Nebraska

The rest of what we have written about Nebraska. Every figure is quoted from Nebraska’s own statute or its courts’ own published schedule, and carries the date we last checked it.

Sources last checked23 August 2026
Page published23 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the dates recorded against the individual citations on this page. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.