Alimony in Pennsylvania.
Whether the state sets a formula or leaves it to the judge, what the court has to weigh, how long it runs, and what brings it to an end.
See a different statePennsylvania
There are percentages, and they do not reach post-divorce alimony. The statutory authority is 23 Pa.C.S. 4322(a), quoted verbatim: '(a) Statewide guideline.–Child and spousal support shall be awarded pursuant to a Statewide guideline as established by general rule by the Supreme Court, so that persons similarly situated shall be treated similarly. The guideline shall be based upon the reasonable needs of the child or spouse seeking support and the ability of the obligor to provide support. In determining the reasonable needs of the child or spouse seeking support and the ability of the obligor to provide support, the guideline shall place primary emphasis on the net incomes and earning capacities of the parties, with allowable deviations for unusual needs, extraordinary expenses and other factors, such as the parties' assets, as warrant special attention. The guideline so developed shall be reviewed at least once every four years.' and 4322(b): '(b) Rebuttable presumption.–There shall be a rebuttable presumption, in any judicial or expedited process, that the amount of the award which would result from the application of such guideline is the correct amount of support to be awarded.' The words in 4322(a) are 'Child and spousal support.' Alimony is not named. The general rule the Supreme Court made is Pa.R.Civ.P. 1910.16-4, whose Part B reads, verbatim: '8. Obligor's Net Income percentage for spousal support or alimony pendente lite x 33% [Without Dependent Children] x 25% [With Dependent Children] … 11. Obligee's Net Income percentage for spousal support or alimony pendente lite x 40% [Without Dependent Children] x 30% [With Dependent Children] … 13. Preliminary Monthly Spousal Support or Alimony Pendente Lite Obligation (line 9 minus line 12-if the result is less than zero, enter a zero on line 13)'. The bracketed labels are the worksheet's two columns, reproduced here because the columnar layout does not survive as plain text. The rule carries two whole formulas, selected by federal tax treatment: '(1) The formula in Parts A through E is for an order entered on or after January 1, 2019, or for a modification of an order entered before January 1, 2019 that includes spousal support or alimony pendente lite in which the amendments to the Internal Revenue Code made by Section 11051 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (Pub.L. No. 115-97) expressly apply.' and '(2) The formula in Parts I through IV is for a modification of an order entered before January 1, 2019 that includes spousal support or alimony pendente lite.' Rule as amended August 11, 2025, effective January 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 5978; the Pennsylvania Code site states it reflects changes effective through 56 Pa.B. 3438 (June 6, 2026). Source: https://www.pacodeandbulletin.gov/Display/pacode?file=/secure/pacode/data/231/chapter1910/s1910.16-4.html and https://www.palegis.us/statutes/consolidated/view-statute?txtType=PDF&ttl=23&div=00.&chpt=43
It is a court rule, not a statute, and it reaches temporary support only. Post-divorce alimony has no arithmetic anywhere in it.
Use the state’s own words
Pennsylvania calls it Three different words for three different things, and they are not stages of one remedy. 'Spousal support' is the support one married person owes the other, grounded in the duty at 23 Pa.C.S. 4321(1): 'Married persons are liable for the support of each other according to their respective abilities to provide support as provided by law.' 'Alimony pendente lite' is support during the pendency of the divorce action, allowed under 23 Pa.C.S. 3702(a). 'Alimony' is the post-divorce award and exists only under 23 Pa.C.S. 3701, which opens 'Where a divorce decree has been entered.' The chapter itself is captioned 'ALIMONY AND SUPPORT' and carries all three. Sources: https://www.palegis.us/statutes/consolidated/view-statute?txtType=PDF&ttl=23&div=00.&chpt=37 and https://www.palegis.us/statutes/consolidated/view-statute?txtType=PDF&ttl=23&div=00.&chpt=43. Using the state’s own term matters when you are searching for forms or reading an order — the words are not interchangeable across state lines, and some of them mean different things in different places.
The short version4 points · tap one to jump to it
- What the law actually says
- How long it lasts — No bracket, no cap, no schedule keyed to the length of the marriage.
- Does behavior matter? — The marital misconduct of either of the parties from the date of final separation shall not be considered by the court in its determinations relative to alimony, except that the court shall consider the abuse of one party by the other party.
- When it ends, and when it can change — Three separate provisions.
In this subject 4
What the law actually says
The short version4 points · tap one to jump to it
- What the law actually says
- How long it lasts — No bracket, no cap, no schedule keyed to the length of the marriage.
- Does behavior matter? — The marital misconduct of either of the parties from the date of final separation shall not be considered by the court in its determinations relative to alimony, except that the court shall consider the abuse of one party by the other party.
- When it ends, and when it can change — Three separate provisions.
In this subject 4
The power the court has
What the judge has to weigh
How long it lasts
Duration
No bracket, no cap, no schedule keyed to the length of the marriage. The whole of the duration provision is 23 Pa.C.S. 3701(c), quoted verbatim: '(c) Duration.–The court in ordering alimony shall determine the duration of the order, which may be for a definite or an indefinite period of time which is reasonable under the circumstances.' The length of the marriage enters only as factor (5) in the list above.
Does behavior matter?
Marital misconduct
Marital misconduct is a statutory factor, with a cut-off. 23 Pa.C.S. 3701(b)(14), quoted verbatim: 'The marital misconduct of either of the parties during the marriage. The marital misconduct of either of the parties from the date of final separation shall not be considered by the court in its determinations relative to alimony, except that the court shall consider the abuse of one party by the other party. As used in this paragraph, "abuse" shall have the meaning given to it under section 6102 (relating to definitions).' Conduct after final separation is out, and abuse is the one exception that stays in. Separately, for support during the case, 23 Pa.C.S. 3702(b), quoted verbatim: '(b) Exception.–Except where the court finds that an order for alimony pendente lite or spousal support is necessary to prevent manifest injustice, a party who has been convicted of committing a personal injury crime against the other party shall not be entitled to spousal support or alimony pendente lite. Any amount paid by the injured party after the commission of the offense but before the conviction of the other party shall be recoverable by the injured party upon petition.' (Added Oct. 24, 2018, P.L.680, No.102, eff. 60 days.)
When it ends, and when it can change
What brings it to an end
Three separate provisions. Remarriage, in the last sentence of 23 Pa.C.S. 3701(e): 'Remarriage of the party receiving alimony shall terminate the award of alimony.' Cohabitation, at 23 Pa.C.S. 3706, quoted verbatim in full: 'No petitioner is entitled to receive an award of alimony where the petitioner, subsequent to the divorce pursuant to which alimony is being sought, has entered into cohabitation with a person of the opposite sex who is not a member of the family of the petitioner within the degrees of consanguinity.' Death, at 23 Pa.C.S. 3707, quoted verbatim in full: 'Upon the death of the payee party, the right to receive alimony pursuant to this chapter shall cease. Upon the death of the payor party, the obligation to pay alimony shall cease unless otherwise indicated in an agreement between the parties or an order of court.' Divergence flag: the cohabitation bar's text still says 'a person of the opposite sex'. It is quoted as enacted. Whether that limitation survives as applied is a question of constitutional law and appellate interpretation, which this page does not address.
Changing it later
23 Pa.C.S. 3701(e), quoted verbatim in full: '(e) Modification and termination.–An order entered pursuant to this section is subject to further order of the court upon changed circumstances of either party of a substantial and continuing nature whereupon the order may be modified, suspended, terminated or reinstituted or a new order made. Any further order shall apply only to payments accruing subsequent to the petition for the requested relief. Remarriage of the party receiving alimony shall terminate the award of alimony.' The threshold is 'changed circumstances of either party of a substantial and continuing nature'. Relief runs only forward from the petition. Where the parties agreed, 23 Pa.C.S. 3701(f): '(f) Status of agreement to pay alimony.–Whenever the court approves an agreement for the payment of alimony voluntarily entered into between the parties, the agreement shall constitute the order of the court and may be enforced as provided in section 3703 (relating to enforcement of arrearages).'
Worth knowing about Pennsylvania
Two things, and the second is the one most often got wrong. First, the vocabulary really is three-way inside one chapter, and the three remedies have different sources of law: spousal support and alimony pendente lite come from 23 Pa.C.S. 3702 and the support duty at 4321, and are set by the Supreme Court's guideline under 4322; alimony comes from 3701 and is set by seventeen factors. Second, and this is the divergence worth publishing: lists that say 'Pennsylvania has an alimony formula' have confused the two. The 33/25 and 40/30 percentages live in Pa.R.Civ.P. 1910.16-4 Part B, and every line of that Part is labeled 'spousal support or alimony pendente lite'. The statutory authority for the guideline, 23 Pa.C.S. 4322(a), says 'Child and spousal support shall be awarded pursuant to a Statewide guideline'. The word 'alimony' does not appear in 4322 at all, and 3701 contains no percentage, no cap and no arithmetic. A Pennsylvania divorce can therefore run on a percentage number until the decree and on a seventeen-factor discretionary judgment after it. Third, a smaller point: 3701(e) makes remarriage terminate alimony flatly, while 3706 bars alimony for cohabitation using text that still reads 'a person of the opposite sex'.
The tax rule changed, and most guides still describe the old one
For a divorce or separation instrument executed after 31 December 2018, alimony is not deductible by the person paying it and not taxable to the person receiving it. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act repealed the provisions that made it otherwise. For an instrument executed on or before that date the old treatment continues — deductible to the payer, taxable to the recipient — unless it is later modified and the modification expressly adopts the new rule.
This is not a detail. Under the old rule a higher-rate payer could transfer income to a lower-rate recipient and the two of them shared the saving. That saving no longer exists, which changes what a given number is worth to each side. New Hampshire wrote the point into its own statute: its 23 per cent figure assumes non-deductibility, and reverts to 30 per cent if the federal treatment is ever restored.
Pennsylvania is the exception that catches people, and it is not a small one. Pennsylvania’s income tax does not begin from your federal return at all. It taxes eight enumerated classes of income, and alimony is not one of them. The Department of Revenue lists alimony outright under “Income Items Never Taxable as PA Compensation.” Nor is there a deduction for alimony paid: Pennsylvania allows only a short enumerated list of deductions and “does not provide for a standard deduction or personal exemption,” and alimony is not on the list.
So alimony has never been taxable to the recipient or deductible to the payer in Pennsylvania, whatever the date on your instrument. There is no pre-2019 grandfather here, because Pennsylvania never adopted the federal rule the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act repealed — there was nothing for the TCJA to take away. If your agreement predates 2019 and you are deducting alimony on your federal return, that deduction does not carry to your PA-40. For an instrument executed after 2018 the federal and Pennsylvania answers happen to coincide, but they arrive there by different routes, which is why so much Pennsylvania divorce writing gets this wrong.
One more that costs real money: alimony still counts toward eligibility income for Pennsylvania’s Tax Forgiveness credit even though it is not taxable — so support that is taxed nowhere can still reduce or remove the credit. Four states do not conform their state income tax to it, in the other direction — Arkansas, California, New Jersey and New York — so this is worth knowing rather than assuming. The fifty-state table.
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, Personal Income Tax Guide, “Gross Compensation” (Income Items Never Taxable as PA Compensation: “Alimony”), “Brief Overview and Filing Requirements” (eight classes; no standard deduction or personal exemption) and “Tax Forgiveness” (eligibility income expressly includes alimony). Non-deductibility follows from Pennsylvania’s structure rather than from a sentence saying so; the PA-40 instruction PDF was serving an error page when this was checked on 15 Sep 2026, and we would rather say that than imply we read it. the state source Checked 15 Sep 2026.
The other number that decides your budget
How Pennsylvania calculates child support, and the overnight count that moves it more than income does.
And the question underneath it
What Pennsylvania presumes about custody, and what the judge has to weigh.
The rest of what we have written about Pennsylvania. Every figure is quoted from Pennsylvania’s own statute or its courts’ own published schedule, and carries the date we last checked it.