More on Alabama

The rest of what we have written about Alabama. Every figure is quoted from Alabama’s own statute or its courts’ own published schedule, and carries the date we last checked it.

Dividing property and money in a Alabama divorce

The money picture for a divorce in Alabama: how property gets divided, what Alabama calls spousal support and how it is decided, whether one spouse can be made to pay the other’s legal fees while the case is running, and — the part nobody publishes — whether Alabama’s own income tax follows the federal rule on alimony.

How this page is sourced

Every claim is traced to Alabama’s own statute, court rule or revenue department, quoted where the wording carries the meaning. Where we could not verify something, the page says so instead of filling the space. Information, not legal advice — and tax questions in particular need a professional in your state. Corrections: thecusp.app/corrections.

Property
Equitable distribution
Divided fairly — which does not necessarily mean equally.
Spousal support
Factors only
No formula. A judge weighs statutory factors, so outcomes vary.
Interim fee award
Not established
We could not confirm one either way.
State tax on alimony
Follows federal
By a cross-reference to two repealed federal sections — see below.

Does Alabama follow the federal alimony rule?

Since 2019, federal law has treated alimony as not deductible by the payer and not taxable to the recipient, for any instrument executed after 31 December 2018. Most people assume every state followed. Most did. Not all.

Alabama follows the federal treatment — by a dangling cross-reference

Alabama conforms — but by a route we have not seen in any other state, and it is worth setting out because it is not a conformity date and it is not an adoption of the federal Act.

Alabama writes its own definitions and then points them at federal sections. Gross income “includes alimony and separate maintenance payments to the extent they are includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes under 26 U.S.C. § 71.” The deduction is “the amount deductible to be the same as the amount deductible for federal income tax purposes under 26 U.S.C. § 215.”

Both of those federal sections were repealed in 2017. For an instrument executed after 31 December 2018, the amount includable under a repealed § 71 is nothing and the amount deductible under a repealed § 215 is nothing — so the Alabama figures follow the federal ones to zero. The cross-references are still sitting in the Alabama Code, pointing at provisions that no longer exist.

Our caveat, stated plainly: this is our reading of the statutory text, not a published position of the Alabama Department of Revenue, which does not appear to have issued guidance on the point. It is the ordinary reading and we think it is right. It is not a departmental confirmation, and we would rather tell you that than let a careful inference pass as an official answer.

Source: Ala. Code § 40-18-14(a)(1) and § 40-18-15(a)(17), read against Pub. L. 115-97 §11051 · source

Nationally: 36 states follow the federal rule, 9 have no income tax, 4 are decoupled, and 1 — Maine — we could not establish. The full fifty-state table and what each decoupled state does differently.

How property is divided

Alabama is an equitable distribution state. That means the court divides marital property fairly, which is not a synonym for equally. What counts as marital rather than separate property is frequently the whole argument.

Ala. Code § 30-2-51(b)(1)
The marital estate is subject to equitable division and distribution.

Source: Ala. Code § 30-2-51(b)(1)

Alimony

Alabama calls it alimony. Using the state’s own word matters when you are searching for forms or reading a statute.

Factors, not a formula

There is no guideline calculation. A judge weighs the statutory factors and reaches a number.

This is the norm and it is why alimony is the least predictable figure in a divorce. Two judges can reach different answers on the same facts and both be right. It also means the strength of your evidence about income, earning capacity and the standard of living during the marriage does real work.

Ala. Code § 30-2-57
the court shall award either rehabilitative or periodic alimony … if the court expressly finds … (3) The circumstances of the case make it equitable

Source: Ala. Code § 30-2-57

Child support

Alabama uses the income shares model — both parents’ incomes go into the calculation, and the result is apportioned between you.

Whichever model applies, this is the most predictable number in your case — there is a formula and a presumption that its output is correct. Deviating from it takes written findings. Run it early; it is free, and it anchors everything else.

Guideline: Rule 32, Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration (statewide child support guidelines)

How Alabama calculates child support, in detail

Who pays for the lawyers

No general fee-shifting statute found

We could not locate a Alabama statute allowing one spouse to be ordered to pay the other’s attorney fees on a need-and-ability basis. In some states this is governed by case law rather than statute. Ask your lawyer directly whether a fee award is available here and on what basis.

Separately, if custody is contested you may be ordered to pay for a guardian ad litem or a custody evaluator, and the court decides how to split that. What that costs in Alabama, and who bears it.

The thing worth knowing about Alabama

Alabama caps periodic alimony’s duration to the length of the marriage (as of the filing date), with no time limit if the marriage lasted 20 years or longer, absent an equitable-deviation finding by the court (Ala. Code § 30-2-57(g)); rehabilitative alimony is separately capped at 5 years absent extraordinary circumstances (§ 30-2-57(b)(1)).

What we could not verify

For Alabama, we could not confirm the following from a primary source. We would rather print the gap than fill it:

  • the attorney fee-shifting provision
  • whether interim fee awards are available

If you practice in Alabama and can point us at the right provision, tell us. Corrections are published with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.

Other states

Go deeper

Sources last checked29 August 2026
Page published29 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.