Travel, custody and relocation in Massachusetts

The passport rules are federal and read the same everywhere. This page is the other layer — what Massachusetts law and Massachusetts’s own court forms say about taking your child on a trip, moving, and who holds the passport between journeys.

See a different stateMassachusetts
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
Read this alongside the federal rules

Getting a child’s passport, consent letters, the Hague Convention and what actually stops a departure are the same in all fifty states — they are on the main travel page. Start there, then come back here for the part that varies.

Custody jurisdictionMassachusetts has not enacted the UCCJEA. It… Which state’s court may decide custody — and why a holiday elsewhere does not move it.
Abduction Prevention ActNoThe court still has its own powers; it just has no uniform-act toolkit to draw on.
Relocation noticeNo notice period Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 208, sec. 30 (titled ‘Minor children; removal from commonwealth; prohibition’). This is a removal-permission statute, not a notice statute.
Triggered byOut of the Commonwealth. Section 30 is triggered by… Out of the Commonwealth. Section 30 is triggered by removing the child ‘out of this commonwealth’. there is no mileage figure, and an in-state move of any distance is outside the statute.

Which court decides — and why a trip does not change it

Massachusetts custody jurisdiction sits under Massachusetts has not enacted the UCCJEA. It instead has the Massachusetts Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 209B, secs. 1-15 – a state-specific act built on the older 1968 Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, not the 1997 UCCJEA.. The home-state definition is at G.L. c. 209B, sec. 1 (definition of ‘Home state’). The practical point for travel is this: a child’s home state is where they lived for six consecutive months before a case started, and a temporary absence counts toward that period. A summer with grandparents in another state does not start a clock there, and it does not let the other parent file somewhere new.

Abduction-prevention powers

Massachusetts has not enacted the Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act. A judge here still has general power to impose travel conditions, but there is no dedicated statutory menu of abduction-prevention measures to point to. If risk is a live issue, the federal route on the main travel page — a valid, enforceable order prohibiting removal, routed to CBP — matters more here, not less.

Moving, and how much warning you owe

Full text: ‘A minor child of divorced parents who is a native of or has resided five years within this commonwealth and over whose custody and maintenance a probate court has jurisdiction shall not, if of suitable age to signify his consent, be removed out of this commonwealth without such consent, or, if under that age, without the consent of both parents, unless the court upon cause shown otherwise orders. The court, upon application of any person in behalf of such child, may require security and issue writs and processes to effect the purposes of this and the two preceding sections.’ Note what the statute does not contain: no advance-notice period, no days, no miles, and no best-interest factor list. It is a consent-or-court-order rule for out-of-state removal by children of divorced parents.

Governed by case law, not statute. No Massachusetts appellate case is named here. The leading removal cases are frequently cited in secondary sources but no opinion was retrieved and read from a Massachusetts court website during this research, so none is asserted.

Relocation and vacation are different questions, and orders often treat them in the same paragraph. A trip is temporary; a move changes the child’s residence. Read your own order for which one your plan actually is before you assume the relocation rule does not apply.

What the standard order says about travel

Massachusetts has no single statewide parenting order. Travel terms come from your own order and from local court rules, which vary by county or district. Read your order rather than a template.

Massachusetts has no statewide standard parenting order, model parenting plan form, or default parenting-time schedule. The Probate and Family Court’s custody and parenting-time forms are pleadings (Complaint for Custody-Support-Parenting Time, Motion for Temporary Orders, Financial Statement, Child Support Guidelines Worksheet), not a template order with travel terms. Nothing statewide prescribes vacation blocks, advance-notice periods, itineraries, out-of-state or out-of-country travel terms, or passport custody. Those terms exist in Massachusetts only if the parties negotiate them into their own separation agreement or judgment.

Who holds the passport

Nothing in Massachusetts’s statutes or standard forms addresses who holds the child’s passport. That is not a gap you have to live with — it is a clause you can ask for, and the federal rules above are the reason to.

What catches people out in Massachusetts

THE BIG ONE: Massachusetts does not have the UCCJEA. Any Massachusetts custody-jurisdiction analysis, affidavit, or registration procedure written against the UCCJEA is against the wrong statute. Cite G.L. c. 209B, the Massachusetts Child Custody Jurisdiction Act.
Because c. 209B is modeled on the 1968 UCCJA rather than the 1997 UCCJEA, it has no ‘exclusive, continuing jurisdiction’ section. Instead, c. 209B, sec. 2(e) lets a Massachusetts court decline to modify another state’s order only where that court no longer has jurisdiction ‘under jurisdictional prerequisites substantially in accordance with this chapter’ or has declined. Continuing-jurisdiction arguments framed in UCCJEA terms do not map cleanly.
c. 209B also has no UCCJEA-style enforcement article: no registration of an out-of-state determination for enforcement, no expedited enforcement petition, no warrant to take physical custody of the child. Sections 12 and 14 handle filing and recognition of foreign-state and international determinations instead.
G.L. c. 208, sec. 30 by its terms covers ‘a minor child of divorced parents’. It is located in the divorce chapter. Parents who were never married are not squarely inside its text, and it also carries a threshold the child must be ‘a native of or has resided five years within this commonwealth’ – a genuinely unusual limitation with no analogue in other states’ relocation statutes.
Section 30 gives a child ‘of suitable age to signify his consent’ a consent role in out-of-state removal – an express statutory child-consent element that most states do not have.
Massachusetts has no statewide parenting plan form. There is no state default on vacation length, travel notice, itineraries, out-of-country travel or who holds the passport. If the judgment is silent, nothing statewide fills the gap.
With no UCCJEA and no UCAPA, a Massachusetts parent worried about international abduction has no statute-based passport-surrender or passport-alert remedy to point to; relief must be sought as ordinary equitable relief in the Probate and Family Court.

Sources for this page

Sources we could not reach when this page was built, recorded so you know what is missing rather than assuming it was checked: https://www.mass.gov/lists/probate-and-family-court-forms-for-actions-involving-parentage-of-children-and-child-support-custody-and-parenting-time-for-unmarried-parents – returned HTTP 403 to a direct fetch from this environment; the forms inventory was read through the mass.gov custody guide page instead.; https://www.uniformlaws.org – enactment tables render only via JavaScript, so the ULC’s own list of UCCJEA/UCAPA enacting states we could not read. Massachusetts’ non-enactment was established directly from the Massachusetts General Laws instead, which is the stronger source anyway.

Every fact above is taken from the source linked beside it. Where a figure could not be confirmed from an official source, this page says so rather than printing a plausible number. Found an error? Tell us — it goes on the corrections page with the date.

Every state

ALAlabamaAKAlaskaAZArizonaARArkansasCACaliforniaCOColoradoCTConnecticutDEDelawareFLFloridaGAGeorgiaHIHawaiiIDIdahoILIllinoisINIndianaIAIowaKSKansasKYKentuckyLALouisianaMEMaineMDMarylandMAMassachusettsMIMichiganMNMinnesotaMSMississippiMOMissouriMTMontanaNENebraskaNVNevadaNHNew HampshireNJNew JerseyNMNew MexicoNYNew YorkNCNorth CarolinaNDNorth DakotaOHOhioOKOklahomaOROregonPAPennsylvaniaRIRhode IslandSCSouth CarolinaSDSouth DakotaTNTennesseeTXTexasUTUtahVTVermontVAVirginiaWAWashingtonWVWest VirginiaWIWisconsinWYWyoming
Sources last checked30 August 2026
Page published30 August 2026
What this means. This is when the sources on this page were last read against their originals — statutes, court rules, official schedules — taken from the date this page was built from its sources. It is not the date the page was last edited. Adding a link or fixing a typo does not move it; re-reading the statute does. Law changes without notice, so treat anything time-sensitive as needing a fresh check. Where we get something wrong we publish it at thecusp.app/corrections with the date, what changed, and how long the error was live.